Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, provided the following conditions are met. As noted on page 99 of the 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming under section G. Special Considerations for Transportation and Vaccines as SBS:

“School-based specialized transportation is defined as transportation to a medically necessary service (as outlined in the IEP of an enrolled Medicaid beneficiary) provided in a specially adapted vehicle that has been physically adjusted or designed to meet the needs of the individual student under IDEA (e.g., special harnesses, wheelchair lifts, ramps, specialized environmental controls, etc.) to accommodate students with disabilities in the school-based setting. Note: the presence of only an aide (on a non-adapted bus/vehicle) or simple seat belts do not make a vehicle specially adapted. Specialized transportation may consist of a specially modified, physically adapted school bus or other vehicle in the specialized transportation cost pool.” 

Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), if a child with a disability is receiving special education and related services, transportation is included in the child’s IEP, and the IEP Team determines that the parent will be providing transportation, the LEA must reimburse the parents in a timely manner for the costs incurred in providing transportation. See the Office of Special Education Programs’ Questions and Answers on Serving Children with Disabilities Eligible for Transportation, November 2009. The LEA may request Medicaid reimbursement if the parent personal vehicle has been specially adapted consistent with the SBS guidance.

FAQ ID:162431

As stated on page 44 of the 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming, if public charter schools are funded predominantly by State and local funds, including local tax revenue or appropriations, similar to other governmental entities, they may be eligible to provide the non-federal share of Medicaid or CHIP expenditures through CPEs.

However, other school entities that are not units of State or local government, including private schools, would not be considered governmental entities under 42 CF.R. § 433.51(b) and § 457.220. Direct payments to private or non-governmental educational institutions for Medicaid and CHIP SBS are available but are typically funded by State appropriations to the Medicaid/CHIP agency. Private and other non-governmental school entities may not participate directly in a CPE. However, an LEA that is a unit of government can contract with providers to provide eligible Medicaid/CHIP services to children in private entities, and CPE the contracted costs, as long as the arrangement adheres to the requirements discussed on page 43 in the 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming.

In addition to a cost methodology, LEAs that are units of government may also transfer the non-federal share funds via intergovernmental transfers (IGTs) to the SMA for services provided in private schools as long as the provider receives and retains the entire Medicaid payment described in the Medicaid State plan.

FAQ ID:162341

Per 45 C.F.R. § 75.430(i)(5), a Random Moment Time Study (RMTS) is a type of “substitute system” used for determining and documenting time spent on, and therefore the costs of, Medicaid administrative and direct service activities. Per page 108 of the 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming, a RMTS is a statistically valid sampling methodology that can be used by States and LEAs to determine how much time eligible staff spend performing Medicaid reimbursable work activities. The RMTS is used to determine a statistic that is applied to salary and fringe benefits for qualified providers and reported on a cost report for direct medical services. A RMTS is generally used in an allocation of a cost pool to allowable medical, administrative (if applicable), and unallowable moments that is further allocated to Medicaid using a Medicaid Eligibility Ratio (MER). The RMTS and supporting documents become part of the documentation for the claim. The RMTS is used to determine a statistic that is applied to salary and fringe benefits for qualified providers and to other payable costs that are reported on a cost report for direct medical services.

A RMTS must reflect all of the time and activities (whether allowable or unallowable under Medicaid) performed by school employees. The RMTS sample universe (or Participant List) should include all staff who potentially perform Medicaid direct services or administrative activities. LEAs should consider both job title and job function when determining which individual staff members should be included in which cost pool.

FAQ ID:162291

CMS’ longstanding standard policy has been to recommend a 15 percent oversampling for RMTS to ensure a valid response rate of at least 85 percent or include all nonresponses as non-Medicaid and unallowable.

In general, all completed responses should be used in an RMTS. However, CMS allows for the use of an alternate methodology in cases where the TSIP specifies an oversample to ensure an adequate number of valid responses for the treatment of time study nonresponses are achieved. The alternate methodology CMS historically has approved uses an 85 percent valid response rate. CMS recommends an oversample of 15 percent to ensure an adequate number of valid responses are received and to meet the required precision level. Per page 113 of the 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming, an oversample may be used only to compensate, not substitute, for the potential number of nonresponses.

FAQ ID:162346

Generally, yes, but how this is achieved is dependent on the reimbursement methodology the State has approved for SBS in its Medicaid State plan. If SBS in a State are paid through fee for service (FFS), then each billed service is claimed and paid as provided in the State plan, regardless of when it occurs.

If a State has a cost methodology in the State plan that uses a time study, the time study must include 100% of providers’ billable time and account for their regular schedules in the methodology and in the time study implementation plan (TSIP). In this case, the providers’ schedules should include after-school hours for programs that are intended to be captured. If these programs are contracted, the contracted costs must also be included in the cost report. If a State does not currently have these programs included in their approved SBS reimbursement methodology, the methodology may have to be amended to capture the additional services. This may include revisions to the SPA, TSIP, PACAP, or other documents, as needed.

In the case of summer activities (i.e., non-regular school days when schools are not capturing any Medicaid services), a time study should be performed to cover these periods. Anytime there are Medicaid services performed and captured in a cost methodology, that time needs to be accounted for in the CMS-approved TSIP, and the allocations explained in the SPA. This is especially true for children with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) who are eligible for Medicaid and require special education and related services after school hours, on weekends, and/or extended school year services (defined in 34 C.F.R § 300.106). SMAs must have procedures in effect that allow for time studies to capture 100% of providers’ time delivering extended school year services. No estimations of Medicaid services can be calculated for vacation or other periods not covered in the time study.

FAQ ID:162421

A Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) was published in the Federal Register at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/FR/ on January 24, 2024. Applications for grant funding were due March 25, 2024. Please contact the MedicaidSBSPlanningGrants@cms.hhs.gov mailbox for more information.

FAQ ID:162436

The formula for State FMAP is established in statute and there is currently no FMAP specific to SBS. The FMAP for direct medical services provided in schools is the same as applicable for Medicaid or CHIP services provided in other service settings. Expenditures for Medicaid administrative activities are generally available at a 50% matching rate, with higher rates for certain activities as specified in the Social Security Act (the Act). Expenditures for CHIP administrative activities, including health services initiatives (HSIs) are available at the Title XXI enhanced or eFMAP and subject to a 10% limit on administrative expenditures.  

FAQ ID:162426

CMS’s general standard regarding time study notification and response time is up to two-day upfront notification and up to a two-day response period. CMS is also willing to work with States that are not immediately able to meet these standards to work out a plan to eventually get to no more than a two-day upfront notification and a two-day response period. If a State believes that up to two days prior notice and two days response is not achievable, the State can propose an alternative to CMS and provide its rationale. CMS will consider additional time for prior notification and/or response time upon request from a State in such circumstances.

FAQ ID:162361

No, generally, States that employ a State plan payment methodology that reimburses a provider for the actual cost of Medicaid services and/or administrative activities may not use a fee schedule rate as a proxy for cost. Instead, states must use cost identification methodologies and supporting documentation methods that are consistent with the requirements of 45 C.F.R. Part 75 and approved by CMS.

When a State relies on a unit of government to fund the non-federal share of Medicaid expenditures through a Certified Public Expenditure (CPE), the reimbursement to the provider is limited to the actual, incurred cost of providing Medicaid services or administrative activities. In those circumstances, a State must use the cost finding and documentation principles that are discussed in 45 C.F.R. Part 75 to determine the amounts that may be reimbursed for Medicaid activities. These costs must be reconciled.

FAQ ID:162391

No, States may opt to maintain their current approach, including a fee schedule approach, if the existing State Plan Amendment (SPA) and underlying implementation mechanisms are compliant with all of the federal requirements discussed in the new SBS Guide. The newly introduced flexibilities are available options for States, but their adoption is not mandatory. If a State wants to depart from its currently approved SBS payment and/or claiming approach, including replacing a current fee schedule methodology or providing higher fee schedule payment amounts, a SPA is necessary.

FAQ ID:162376