Frequently Asked Questions are used to provide additional information and/or statutory guidance not found in State Medicaid Director Letters, State Health Official Letters, or CMCS Informational Bulletins. The different sets of FAQs as originally released can be accessed below.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do states need to cost allocate eligibility worker costs across programs? Will claiming the 75 percent FFP require new or increased time reporting by employees? What must a state submit in its operations APD and cost allocation plan?
In situations where eligibility workers determine eligibility for multiple programs, all costs must be distributed to the appropriate programs and governing FFP rates (90/75/50) based on approved time study methodologies and/or cost allocation plans consistent with OMB Circular A-87 cost allocation principles. These costs must also clearly differentiate between resources needed for direct data and systems-related activities and resources needed for MMIS and eligibility determination systems versus program management and oversight activities, which are only eligible for 50 percent FFP. State agencies performing eligibility determination currently develop and maintain methodologies for allocating costs among different health and human services programs. CMS does not anticipate the additional reporting required to obtain 75 percent FFP will add a significant amount of time to that process. From 45 CFR section 95.507, Plan requirements, the cost allocation support should include the following:
- A description of the procedures used to identify, measure, and allocate all costs to each of the programs
- Conform to the accounting principles and standards prescribed in Office of Management and Budget Circular A-87, and other pertinent Department regulations and instructions;
- Contain sufficient information in such detail to make an informed judgment on the correctness and fairness of the state's procedures for identifying, measuring, and allocating the costs
- The cost allocation plan shall contain the following information:
- An organizational chart showing the placement of each unit whose costs are charged to the programs operated by the state agency
- A listing of all federal and all non-federal programs performed, administered, or serviced by these organizational units.
- A description of the activities performed by each organizational unit and, where not self-explanatory an explanation of the benefits provided to federal programs.
- The procedures used to identify, measure, and allocate all costs to each benefiting program and activity (including activities subject to different rates of FFP).
States should consult with their CMS cost allocation leads to determine whether any change to their approved cost allocation plan is needed and work with their counterparts at human services agencies as necessary. The methods of cost allocation should be documented in the state operations APD update submission to support the proposed budget.
Supplemental Links:
- This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 105.59 KB)
FAQ ID:93721
SHARE URLHow will CMS monitor and oversee state implementation? Will CMS ask states to report on enhanced maintenance and operations activities separately on the CMS-64-10 and 37-10? How will CMS verify state reporting?
As noted earlier, states must submit an Operations APD to request this funding. CMS will monitor state implementation of the enhanced 75 percent FFP through ongoing review of state eligibility system implementation and operations, as well as through revised claims reporting. Specifically, CMS is revising the CMS-64-10 and 37-10 forms to separately capture eligibility determination system related maintenance and operations costs. We will separately track costs related to IT systems and eligibility determination staff as follows:
- For the IT and systems maintenance and operations, costs will be reported on the CMS-64-10 and 37-10 on line 28C - Operation of an approved Medicaid eligibility determination system/cost of in-house activities - 75 percent FFP and 28D - Operation of an approved Medicaid eligibility determination system/cost private sector contractors- 75 percent FFP.
- For the Eligibility Determination workers staffing eligible for enhanced match, costs will be reported on the CMS-64-10 and 37-10 on line 28E - Eligibility Determination staff - cost of in-house activities - 75 percent FFP and 28F- Eligibility Determination staff - cost of private sector contractors - 75 percent FFP.
- For the Eligibility Determinations workers staffing eligible for regular administrative match, costs will be reported on the CMS-64-10 and 37-10 on line 28G - Eligibility Determination staff - cost of in-hour activities - 50 percent FFP and 28 H - cost of private sector contractors - 50 percent FFP.
As this enhanced match is implemented, CMS will closely monitor implementation and reporting, and if necessary, will revise how this data is collected on the estimate and expenditure reporting forms to ensure states and CMS have the proper break out to track these activities and their related claims.
Furthermore, CMS will continue to work with states over time to ensure that their systems continue to remain compliant with the Seven Conditions and Standards. For example, under the Reporting Condition, state systems should be able to produce accurate data that are necessary for oversight, administration, evaluation, integrity and transparency. CMS has recently provided technical specifications for the Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (TMSIS) data file to states following more than a year of collaboration with states participating in the T-MSIS pilot. CMS envisions that the T-MSIS data file will be submitted on a monthly basis. We anticipate releasing additional guidance on this subject in the coming weeks.
As with all expenditures, federal match must be properly claimed and is subject to review and approval. Again, CMS will work closely with the each state to review and approve costs covered and will use the APD process to confirm with states specific implementation details, before states start to submit claims.
Supplemental Links:
- This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 105.59 KB)
FAQ ID:93726
SHARE URLWhat help will be available to states to accommodate the added administrative burdens and costs they will have to bear if they expand coverage in Medicaid?
We have provided 90 percent federal matching funds for the new or improved eligibility systems that states are developing to accommodate the new modified adjusted gross income rules and to coordinate coverage with the Exchange. To further reduce system costs, we have promoted ways for states to share elements of their system builds with each other, and we will be sharing the business rules for adopting modified adjusted gross income in the new eligibility systems. In addition we are designing, with extensive state and stakeholder consultation, a new combined and streamlined application that states can adopt (or modify subject to Secretarial approval). And, we will continue exploring opportunities to provide States additional support for the administrative costs of eligibility changes. These and other initiatives relating to state systems development will lower administrative costs.
Implementation of the on-line application system, the new data-based eligibility rules, verification and renewal procedures and states' access to the federally-managed data services hub ("the hub") will collectively help defray states' ongoing costs and result in greater efficiency in the long term. For example, states will be able to electronically verify eligibility factors through the hub, where previously they had to verify through multiple federal venues. This is expected to lower the per-person administrative costs of enrollment and renewal for both newly and currently eligible individuals. As stated in previous guidance, no charge will be imposed on states for use of the hub, nor for the required data accessed there. In addition, it is anticipated that many individuals- both those who are eligible under current state eligibility rules as well as those who are eligible under the adult expansion- will apply for coverage via the Exchange. Our rules provide states the option to have the Exchange determine eligibility for Medicaid or to assess eligibility for Medicaid, in both cases using the state's eligibility rules and subject to certain standards. No charge will be imposed on states for the Medicaid determinations or assessments conducted by the Exchanges.
Supplemental Links:
- This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 359.41 KB)
FAQ ID:94586
SHARE URLCMS has released 90/10 funding for states to improve their eligibility systems for Medicaid. Will that funding continue?
Yes. Both the "90/10" funding for Medicaid eligibility (E&E) system design and development, and the enhanced 75 percent matching rate for maintenance and operations of such systems, will be available indefinitely as long as the systems meet applicable program requirements.
In previous guidance (PDF, 104.38 KB), we have assured states that the 90/10 and 75/25 percent funding for eligibility systems will be available without regard to whether a state decides to expand its program to cover newly eligible low-income adults. We reiterate that system modernization will be supported and the enhanced matching funds will be available regardless of a state's decision on expansion. Additionally, we will continue exploring opportunities to provide states additional support for the administrative costs of eligibility changes.
Supplemental Links:
- This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 359.41 KB)
FAQ ID:94591
SHARE URLCMS has advised states that the 90/10 matching funds for modernization of Medicaid eligibility and enrollment (E&E) systems is not related to a state's decision about whether to proceed with the Medicaid expansion for the new adult group. Is 90/10 funding contingent on a state complying with other aspects of the Affordable Care Act related to eligibility? Must a state that uses 90/10 funding build into its design and development support for the new "adult group," even if it does not plan now to proceed with the expansion?
The 90/10 funding is not contingent on a state's decision to proceed with its Medicaid expansion. As the preamble to the final regulation makes clear, the enhanced funding was not solely for eligibility determination systems that support the Medicaid expansion. (76 Fed Reg 21950-21975 (April 19, 2011) and 42 CFR Part 433.
CMS was clear in the final rule that enhanced funding could be available for eligibility determination systems that determine eligibility for traditional eligibility groups. However, such systems must meet all requirements, standards and conditions included in the final rule, including the Standards and Conditions for Medicaid IT that ensure modernized and efficient eligibility systems that produce accurate and timely eligibility determinations and that can interface seamlessly with the Exchange operating in that state. In all states, including those that do not proceed with the expansion, state eligibility systems must be able to electronically pass accounts between the Exchange (whether state-based or federally-facilitated) in order to facilitate seamless coordination. In addition, the systems must be able to support a single streamlined application for coverage among insurance affordability programs, support Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI)-based eligibility determinations; and must support new renewal processes and connections for data-driven, electronic verifications as described in the Medicaid eligibility final rule issued March 23, 2012 (available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-03- 23/pdf/2012-6560.pdf ).
States are not required to "build in" programming for the new adult group. However, a state that conforms to the Standards and Conditions for Medicaid IT (particularly modular design and separation of business rules from core programming) will be able to quickly and efficiently support enrollment for the expansion population. In addition, enhanced funding is available for states that wish to explicitly "build in" placeholder programming for the new adult group now to provide for future flexibility.
Supplemental Links:
- This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 104.38 KB)
FAQ ID:93216
SHARE URLWhat technical guidance and deliverables can CMS offer to states that are modernizing their eligibility and enrollment (E&E) systems?
CMS has developed the Medicaid Eligibility and Enrollment Toolkit (MEET) to provide guidance for states that are conducting E&E systems projects. The MEET is available at https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/data-and-systems/meet/index.html.
Also, various artifacts developed by states are posted in a shared environment for reuse by others. These artifacts can be used to help jump-start projects. More information on reuse, including access to the reuse repository, is available at https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/data-and-systems/reuse/index.html.
Supplemental Links:
- This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 104.38 KB)
FAQ ID:93226
SHARE URLWhen does CMS need to know states' intention to proceed with the Medicaid expansion for purposes of the FFE build? What if a State adopts the expansion too late to have the change accommodated by the FFE (at least for some period of time); how would the coordination provisions of the law be accommodated?
There is no deadline by which states need to decide on the Medicaid expansion. We understand that there are many considerations involved in this decision, and CMS stands ready to work with states on their individual timetables. Regardless of the expansion, every state that uses the Federally Facilitated Exchange will need to support coordination between the Medicaid and CHIP programs and the FFE and otherwise comply with the new MAGI rules as well as the application, renewal and verification procedures described in the Medicaid eligibility final rule issued March 23, 2012 (available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-03-23/pdf/2012- 6560.pdf). We will be working with each state to ensure that the appropriate business rules are accommodated and tested, and the necessary electronic account handoffs are in place, before the FFE is operational and the new Medicaid rules are in effect. We are continuing to provide more guidance and information on these issues as part of the FFE manual and MOU process as well as through our SOTA calls. We are also establishing a state- to- FFE change process to help manage changes in policies that a state may make over time; a state that decides later to proceed with expansion will be accommodated within that process.
Supplemental Links:
- This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 104.38 KB)
FAQ ID:93236
SHARE URLHow will the Supreme Court Decision affect CMS's ability to ensure other aspects of the law such as those affecting interactions with the Federally-facilitated Exchange? For example, if a state does not want to exchange electronic accounts with the FFE, what will be required and what, if any, penalties could be imposed?
As previously stated in a letter from the Secretary to the nation's governors, the Supreme Court held that a state may not lose federal funding for its existing Medicaid program if the state chooses not to participate in the expansion of Medicaid eligibility for low-income adults. The Court's decision did not affect other provisions of the law. State Medicaid and CHIP programs will need to coordinate with the Federally-facilitated Exchange, regardless of a state's decision to proceed with expansion. States will need to be part of the seamless system for people to apply for all coverage programs; and will need to coordinate eligibility with the new insurance affordability programs. These provisions have relevance regardless of whether a state chooses to participate in the expansion for low-income adults.
Supplemental Links:
- This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 104.38 KB)
FAQ ID:93246
SHARE URLWhat will be the role of the FFE in reviewing applications from individuals with incomes below 133% of the FPL in states that do not implement the Medicaid expansion?
The FFE's role is the same whether or not a state implements the Medicaid expansion for low-income adults. The FFE will still make MAGI-based determinations or assessments of eligibility for Medicaid and CHIP and will assess eligibility for premium tax credits and cost sharing. The FFE will apply the state's eligibility levels for Medicaid/CHIP when it makes the Medicaid determination or assessment. In addition, as established in the Exchange and Medicaid/CHIP eligibility final rules, the FFE will electronically transfer accounts for individuals who are either determined or assessed as eligible for Medicaid and CHIP (it is a state option whether to have the FFE determine or assess eligibility) for further evaluation/action.
Supplemental Links:
- This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 104.38 KB)
FAQ ID:93256
SHARE URLHow would a state's decision not to expand their Medicaid program's eligibility affect their ability to get information from the federal HUB under a state-based exchange model?
The federal hub will provide data verification services to any state-based exchange and to the Medicaid and CHIP program without regard to whether a state has adopted the low-income adult expansion. Consistent with the regulations issued on March 23, 2012, state Medicaid and CHIP programs must rely on the HUB for certain information; this provision applies without regard to whether a state has adopted the Medicaid expansion for low-income adults.
Supplemental Links:
- This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 104.38 KB)
FAQ ID:93261
SHARE URL