U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions are used to provide additional information and/or statutory guidance not found in State Medicaid Director Letters, State Health Official Letters, or CMCS Informational Bulletins. The different sets of FAQs as originally released can be accessed below.

Showing 31 to 40 of 61 results

Under section 4106 of the Affordable Care Act, are clinical preventive services that receive a D recommendation ineligible for Medicaid coverage?

Clinical preventive services that receive a D recommendation are eligible for Medicaid coverage. States determine medical necessity criteria, and determine whether they will cover D recommended services. However, United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) grade D recommended services are not eligible for the one percentage point federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) increase.

Supplemental Links:

FAQ ID:91666

SHARE URL

When will the guidance be available for whether unlicensed practitioners will be able to furnish the Affordable Care Act section 4106 services?

"Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Programs: Essential Health Benefits in Alternative Benefit Plans, Eligibility Notices, Fair Hearing and Appeal Processes, and Premiums and Cost Sharing; Exchanges: Eligibility and Enrollment Final Rule" (CMS-2334-F), published in the Federal Register on 7/15/2013, conformed the regulatory definition of preventive services at § 440.130(c) with the statute relating to the issue of who can be providers of preventive services. Per the final rule, effective 1/1/2014, preventive services may be recommended by a physician or other licensed practitioner. Therefore, unlicensed practitioners will be able to furnish preventive services (including the services mentioned in section 4106), based on the recommendation of a physician or other licensed practitioner, according to the provider qualifications established by each respective state, within broad federal parameters. In order for states to receive the one percentage point federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) increase for unlicensed practitioners, it is likely that a state plan amendment updating section (13)(c) of the state plan will be necessary. Please refer to the preventive service CMCS Informational Bulletin issued on November 27, 2013 for additional information regarding adding unlicensed practitioners to the preventive services section of the state plan.

Supplemental Links:

FAQ ID:91676

SHARE URL

Under section 4106 of the Affordable Care Act, can CMS recommend a list of current procedural terminology (CPT) and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes to be covered for the corresponding United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) grade A and B recommendations?

While section 4106 of the Affordable Care Act states that USPSTF grade A and B services, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended vaccines and their administration must be covered to secure the one percentage point FMAP increase, it is incumbent upon state Medicaid agencies to continue to work with, and communicate to, providers concerning state-specific systems and appropriate codes. The information provided by the American Medical Association in the below link (the CPT Code Pocket Guide: Preventive services with cost-sharing waived) can be used as a starting point in creating a cross-walk from the USPSTF and ACIP recommended codes, but it is not all-inclusive.

In addition, the October 2012 State Health Official (SHO) letter, gave the below web site address for HCPCS codes effective for service dates on or after January 1, 2012, and contacts within CMS for questions regarding HCPCS codes.

http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/HCPCSReleaseCodeSets/Alpha-Numeric-HCPCS.html 

Supplemental Links:

FAQ ID:91686

SHARE URL

Is there a deadline for states to create a public awareness campaign under section 4004(i) of the Affordable Care Act?

While there is no deadline given in the provision for states to create public awareness campaigns to inform Medicaid beneficiaries of the preventive services covered in their state, CMS looks forward to partnering with states to develop innovative approaches. CMS is required to prepare a periodic Report to Congress including "summaries of the states' efforts to increase awareness of coverage of obesity-related services," and the next report will be submitted by January 1, 2014. As such, CMS is gathering information about states' efforts to inform the 2014 report. States may email MedicaidCHIPPrevention@cms.hhs.gov to submit information about preventive and obesity-related services public awareness efforts in their communities.

Supplemental Links:

FAQ ID:91491

SHARE URL

Can a state submit a state plan amendment (SPA) to implement section 4106 of the Affordable Care Act at any time?

Yes, a state may submit a SPA at any time. The one percentage point increase in federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) per the requirements outlined in section 4106 of the Affordable Care Act does not have an end date.

Supplemental Links:

FAQ ID:91511

SHARE URL

Will any individuals lose coverage as a result of the new MAGI-based income methodology?

No one loses coverage as a result of converting to MAGI rules, but, in states that don't adopt the new adult eligibility group, it is possible that some individuals will lose coverage.

The Affordable Care Act ensured that no one would lose health coverage--if they were not eligible under the new MAGI standards either they would be covered under the new Medicaid adult coverage group or they would be able to purchase insurance through the Marketplace with the benefit of a premium tax credit and likely cost sharing reductions. Following the Supreme Court's decision, the Medicaid expansion is voluntary for states, and in states that do not adopt the new coverage group some individuals may lose coverage at the time of their renewal when the new rules are applied.

FAQ ID:92501

SHARE URL

It looks like in some states CHIP has gotten smaller; do the new MAGI rules result in smaller CHIP programs?

No, the change to MAGI does not affect the size of CHIP Programs.

The number of children in CHIP does not change as a result of MAGI because the new standards have the same value as the old standards; they simply translate the state's pre-MAGI two-step policies into a simpler one-step calculation. For example, if the state under old rules covers children in Medicaid with incomes up to 150% of the Federal Poverty Limit (FPL) and CHIP from 150% to 200% of the FPL, and under MAGI the new Medicaid income standard is 160% of the FPL, that doesn't mean that children between 150% and 160% are losing CHIP coverage--it means that many children between 150% and 160% of the FPL using net income standards were already eligible for Medicaid because of the use of disregards.

FAQ ID:92506

SHARE URL

Do the new MAGI standards mean that more children will move from CHIP to Medicaid?

No, the number of children moving from CHIP to Medicaid is not affected by the change to MAGI.

Under the law, those states that cover children ages 6-18 with incomes between 100% and 133% of the FPL in CHIP will be transitioning these children to Medicaid so that children under 133% of the FPL, regardless of their age, are eligible for the same coverage program (some states will continue to have different, higher income standards for younger children). The change to MAGI standards does not change the number of children who will move from CHIP to Medicaid.

FAQ ID:92511

SHARE URL

With regards to MAGI, can states that want to have one eligibility level for children, ages 1-18, do so?

Yes. The new converted standards are based on the state's current income eligibility standards and their pre-2014 disregards. So if children in different age groups have different effective eligibility levels under a state's pre-2014 rules, the children will have different converted standards. For example, if a state has been covering children aged 1-5 to 133% FPL and children aged 6-18 to 100% FPL, the state's MAGI eligibility standard in 2014 may be 139% FPL for children aged 1-5 and 133% FPL for older children.

FAQ ID:92516

SHARE URL

With regards to MAGI, can states that want to have a "rounded" number for their eligibility standards do so or must they stay with the converted standards?

Yes, states can adjust their standards within certain limits established by law.

States can adjust both their adult standards (e.g., for pregnant women) and their children standards, as long as they do not reduce eligibility levels below minimum standards established by the law. CMS can advise states of their options.

FAQ ID:92521

SHARE URL
Results per page