Frequently Asked Questions

Before MAGI, if a state's income limit was 100% of the FPL--the state would first look at the person's gross income, then subtract out (for example) 30% of their earned income and an amount they spend on childcare as work-related expense deductions and then compare that net income to 100% of the FPL. This means that under the pre-MAGI rules, in a state with an income eligibility limit of 100% of the FPL, a person with income over 100% of the FPL can qualify for Medicaid (because of the deductions and disregards).

FAQ ID:92486

The state will look at the individual's modified adjusted gross income, deduct 5%, which the law provides as a standard disregard, and compare that income to the new standard.

FAQ ID:92491

Based on guidance issued in December 2012 (PDF, 177.59 KB), CMS worked with states to set their new standards. Most states used a model that determines the average value of the disregards a state had in place and then added that amount to the old standard to create the new eligibility levels. In the example above, in a state with a net income standard of 100% of the FPL, if the average value of the disregards equaled 6 percentage points of the FPL, that value would be added to the old standard for a new eligibility standard of 106% of the FPL.

FAQ ID:92496

The Affordable Care Act established an income disregard equal to five percentage points of the FPL disregard "for the purposes of determining income eligibility" for individuals whose eligibility is based on MAGI. In our final rule issued July 15, 2013, we provide that the disregard is applied to the income calculation of individuals only to the extent that the disregard matters for the purposes of determining eligibility for Medicaid or CHIP under MAGI-based rules-that is, those for whom the application of the disregard means the difference between being eligible for Medicaid or CHIP and being ineligible.

The disregard matters for purposes of determining Medicaid or CHIP eligibility only in cases where individuals have MAGI-based income that is above the highest applicable income standard under the program (Medicaid or CHIP), but would be within that income standard if the disregard were applied. This is the case only when the MAGI-based income is no higher than five percent of the FPL higher than that income standard. The disregard would not be applied for a determination of the particular eligibility group in which the individual qualifies, but only for overall eligibility for Medicaid or CHIP. We understand that this policy changes how disregards have been applied in the past, but believe this policy should be administratively simple to apply, for example, by applying the disregard at the point before a decision of ineligibility based on income would otherwise be made. This also ensures that the disregard does not reduce the "newly eligible" population for whom the increased federal matching rate is available.

For example, in a state that extends coverage to the new adult group, if a parent applied and has MAGI-based income within five percentage points of the FPL above the net income standard for the mandatory parent/caretaker relative group, the disregard would not apply because the disregard would not be needed for eligibility. The parent could be made eligible in the adult group instead. In that same state, if a parent applied with MAGI income within five percentage points of the FPL above the net income standard for the adult group (133% FPL), the five percent disregard would be applied to ensure that the parent could obtain eligibility in Medicaid and the parent would be made eligible in the adult group.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 295.71 KB)

FAQ ID:92591

Preventive services include immunizations, screenings for common chronic and infectious diseases and cancers, clinical and behavioral interventions to manage chronic disease and reduce associated risks, and counseling to support healthy living and self-management of chronic conditions, such as those associated with obesity. A list of preventive health care services recommended as Grade A or B by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force can be found at: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/uspstf-a-and-b-recommendations/.

Through Medicaid's children's benefit - Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment (EPSDT) - children under age 21 enrolled in Medicaid are assured coverage for preventive and comprehensive health services. States cover adult preventive services within Medicaid through both mandatory and optional benefit categories. Some preventive services (such as those related to family planning) may be defined in a state's mandatory set of benefits while others may be included in the optional benefit category. As a result, Medicaid programs differ from state to state on the coverage of preventive services for adults.

Obesity-related services are those services that help prevent and manage unhealthy weight. Medicaid and CHIP programs can cover a range of services to prevent and reduce obesity including Body Mass Index (BMI) screening, education and counseling on nutrition and physical activity, prescription drugs that promote weight loss, and, as appropriate, bariatric surgery.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 86.67 KB)

FAQ ID:92666

Affordable Care Act Section 4004(i)(2) calls for "state public awareness campaigns to educate Medicaid enrollees regarding availability and coverage of preventive and obesity related services with the goal of reducing incidences of obesity." The statute tasks states with designing the public awareness campaign because states have a better understanding of what outreach efforts will best meet the needs of their state Medicaid and CHIP population. Activities that provide information to beneficiaries about the preventive and obesity-related services covered in the state's Medicaid and CHIP programs will satisfy the requirement. Federal funding would be available for such activities as administrative costs of the Medicaid and CHIP programs.

Some resources that states may want to consider as they move forward with their activities include:

• Healthy Weight, Healthy People, Healthy Communities page on the Health Resources and Services Administration's website
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity 
• "F as in Fat: How Obesity Threatens America's Future 2012," issued by the Trust for America's Health and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

States can receive the 50 percent Medicaid administrative matching rate for public awareness campaign activities, and will receive their existing Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) rate for preventive services.

The Affordable Care Act includes additional funding for states that cover Grade A and B recommended services of the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and all Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended adult vaccines and their administration without cost sharing. CMS has released separate guidance on that provision which can be found at https://www.medicaid.gov/sites/default/files/Federal-Policy-Guidance/downloads/SMD-13-002.pdf (PDF, 138.73 KB).

In addition, CMS can provide technical assistance to states with reporting and interventions that they have in place to improve performance on the prevention core measures.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 86.67 KB)

FAQ ID:92671

Yes, if a state has undertaken an initiative to provide information on Medicaid coverage of preventive services since the passage of the Affordable Care Act in March 2010 then they have met this requirement.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 86.67 KB)

FAQ ID:92676

If these practices and health systems maintain the types of documentation described in the previous answer, FAQ45736, with respect to managed care organizations, attestation by the group or system would be acceptable. As previously noted, a physician actually must be practicing as an internist, pediatrician or family physician in order to be eligible for higher payment. Board certification does not always equate to practice characteristics. Therefore, attestation on the basis of information on board certification alone would not suffice.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 25.85 KB)

FAQ ID:93866

No. The attestation and eligibility are physician-specific. If a physician provides services both in a fee-for-service and managed care environment, they need only complete the process of attestation once in order to receive higher payment for all eligible services they provide. CMS expects all information on self-attestation to be fully available to the state, regardless of which party collected this information.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 25.85 KB)

FAQ ID:93871

States have the flexibility to count eligible services provided by a physician in neighboring states in meeting the 60 percent threshold, but are not required to do so.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 25.85 KB)

FAQ ID:93876